How to Reduce Hydrocarbon Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Greenhouse Gas Emissions | How to Reduce Hydrocarbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions | Bair Research

How to Reduce Hydrocarbon Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Greenhouse gas emissions (except CO2) are unburned and or partially burned fuel. In the case of natural gas it is in the form of methane and crystalline carbon, gasoline, diesel, or any liquid fuel:  smoke, smell and/or soot, and in coal soot, ash (anything other than snow white) and clinker’s (clinkers are fire box contamination containing some remaining combustibles and non-combustibles such as minerals and metals. CO2 on the other hand, is a result of complete combustion of hydrocarbons and therefore can only be reduced by improved efficiency.  Our miraculous technology accomplishes both through catalysis, converting energy robbing GHG to power improving efficiency and reducing all Greenhouse Gas Emissions – GHG.

It is these contaminants that increase maintenance and deterioration  Our catalyst technology will remove most of these contaminants, improving efficiency. Therefore, diminish all GHG including CO2 and increase longevity through cleanliness and vibration reduction.

Data analysis, relevance, and redaction
Documents contained here after > 30 years of research prove our technology’s efficacy.  Hydrocarbons have changed little given all the years of chemistry with much effort and minimal effect since their current formation and are identical or extremely similar. In almost all cases in heavier fuels such as diesel  the changes reduce sulfur that acts as a lubricant and produces a GHG (greenhouse gas) known as SOx. The major issue for burning coal and oil in power plants.  Natural gas is virtually identical, heavy fuels (mainly used in oceangoing ships and some power plants) are much the same although, there is a push to reduce sulfur content and blend with costly lower sulfur fuels. Diesel, the sulfur has been lowered but chemicals have been added to maintain engine longevity (lubrication lost from sulfur removal). Much effort has been employed to reduce toxic gas emissions such as NOx (nitric oxide compounds), HC (hydrocarbons), CO (carbon monoxide) and CO2 all referred to as GHG. Current technology has been utilized to convert these emissions after they are created in the exhaust systems referred to as after-treatment .

Our technology dramatically reduces/blocks their (GHGs) formation in the first place during combustion. Therefore, providing additional utilized energy, improved thermal efficiency, potential lower cost fuel, fuel consumption (minimizing CO2 production) and all GHG emissions reductions.  In addition, it enhances after-treatment performance in all aspects dramatically reducing their arduous maintenance, in most cases restoring beyond original performance and dramatic increase in longevity.

Redactions
Companies and/or tradenames no longer used or in business. Bair Research (B R&D) is the sole provider, continuously improving delivery systems, reliability, adaptation modularity, fuel specific formulae, and broadening capabilities through ongoing research i.e. sulfur and mercury mitigation. These redactions are utilized to encourage focus on our current technology’s eminent relevance and performance.

Elliott P Doane PhD manager engineer, energy technology engineering and technical services Kerr-McGee Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (coal and other energy services). Dr. Doane studied our technology extensively and the document provided here discusses his findings for reducing all forms of hydrocarbon emissions in diesel engines and expresses his erudite hypothesis the technology will be effective on coal.  His referenced studies also mention the technology’s emissions reduction improvement over time.

Dr. Doane set out to disprove Bair R&D’s technology (under a different name at that time and companies mentioned and referenced in his study are no longer in operation and Bair R&D is the sole provider of this technology). Much to his surprise the technology worked beyond his imagination. Dr. Doane was so impressed with the results of his more than 1000 hours of laboratory testing that he wrote a paper along with his colleagues against advice that it may damage his credibility. Nevertheless, his findings he felt were so important to the diesel industry to cost-effectively reduce exhaust emissions he submitted his paper to the society of mining engineers (SME)


The University of Kraków also indicated substantial reductions in diesel hydrocarbon emissions confirming Dr. Doane’s findings related to diesel fuel with more in-depth recognition of performance efficiency, fuel savings, particulate reduction and transformation. In fact, as highlighted in the translation dramatically eliminated 55% aromatic hydrocarbon rings many believe to be cancerogenic compounds from diesel particulate.


Texas asphalt plant thermography natural gas.